Skip to main content

Power BI Embedded vs Premium vs digital signage

Power BI Embedded, Premium capacity, PowerPoint embeds, and digital signage are often discussed as alternatives. They aren’t. This guide explains what each option is designed to solve, where teams go wrong, and how they fit together in real deployments.

George avatar
Written by George
Updated over a month ago

💁 About this article
This article is part of Fugo’s Power BI knowledge base: a collection of resources answering common Power BI questions. We include notes throughout where Fugo’s integration may be helpful for displaying dashboards on digital signage.

Table of contents


The real question people are asking

Most Power BI licensing questions don’t start with architecture, but frustration.

“We built something useful in Power BI. Now more people want to see it. Why is this suddenly complicated?”

From there, teams start pulling on threads:

  • Can we share this without licenses?

  • Can we embed it somewhere else?

  • Can we put it on a TV?

  • Can we make it feel more like a product?

That’s how Power BI Premium, Power BI Embedded, Power BI in PowerPoint, and digital signage all end up in the same conversation even though they solve very different problems.

Let’s separate them cleanly.


Power BI Embedded: not cheaper Power BI, but programmable Power BI

Power BI Embedded is an official Microsoft product, but it’s a developer platform, not a distribution feature.

Its purpose is simple in theory: Let applications use Power BI as a rendering engine, without requiring each end user to have a Power BI account.

That’s why Embedded exists at all.

What Embedded actually enables

Power BI Embedded allows you to:

  • Embed reports inside custom web or mobile applications

  • Use your own authentication system instead of Microsoft Entra

  • Treat Power BI visuals as part of a broader product experience

  • Support user-specific views, bookmarks, comments, and writeback

  • Expose analytics to customers, partners, or subscribers

This is why it shows up in:

  • SaaS products

  • Customer portals

  • Subscription platforms

  • ISV offerings

In those contexts, Embedded can feel transformative because it turns Power BI from a tool into a component.

Why Embedded feels expensive and confusing

Embedded pricing isn’t “per user.” It’s per capacity, and that’s where confusion starts.

Costs depend on:

  • Capacity SKU (A-series or Fabric F-series)

  • Model size

  • Refresh frequency

  • Concurrent usage

  • Query complexity

This is why Reddit threads are full of wildly different numbers:

  • Some teams run Embedded comfortably on F2

  • Others blow through capacity and hit four figures fast

  • Some never needed Premium at all

  • Others accidentally stacked costs they didn’t need

The key point: Embedded shifts complexity from licensing to engineering.

If you don’t have web development resources - or don’t want to build and maintain auth, tokens, scaling, and UX - Embedded often creates more work, not less.

That’s why many teams evaluate it, then quietly walk away.


Power BI Premium: scaling internal consumption, not embedding

Power BI Premium (now delivered through Fabric capacity, e.g. F64+) solves a very different problem:

How do we let lots of internal users view reports without licensing each one individually?

Premium:

  • Keeps Power BI usage inside Microsoft’s ecosystem

  • Uses Entra ID authentication

  • Preserves RLS and governance

  • Allows free-license users to consume content

It does not:

  • Remove Power BI from the browser

  • Create a product-like experience

  • Help with external users

  • Solve physical display scenarios

Premium is best understood as Power BI at enterprise scale, not as a distribution workaround.

That’s why it often makes sense only after:

  • Viewer counts reach the hundreds

  • Power BI is already a core internal platform

  • Governance and performance matter more than cost minimization


Power BI in PowerPoint: the first workaround everyone tries

Power BI’s PowerPoint integration isn’t a sharing model, and it isn’t meant to replace Premium or Embedded.

It exists for presented environments:

  • Meetings

  • Reviews

  • Workshops

  • Walkthroughs where someone is actively driving the narrative

In that context, it works well:

  • Live data

  • Interactive visuals

  • Familiar PowerPoint workflow

  • No additional infrastructure

Where it breaks down is persistence.

PowerPoint:

  • Requires a logged-in user

  • Depends on a running session

  • Doesn’t recover well from restarts

  • Isn’t designed for unattended playback

Once a report is expected to:

  • Run all day

  • Stay visible without human input

  • Live on a shared screen

PowerPoint will feel like a pseudo-solution.


Digital signage: a delivery layer Power BI never tried to be

This is where digital signage enters and why it shouldn’t be compared directly to Embedded or Premium.

Digital signage doesn’t solve:

  • Licensing

  • Modeling

  • Analytics

  • Auth complexity

It solves visibility.

A TV screen:

  • Isn’t a user

  • Doesn’t log in

  • Doesn’t click refresh

  • Doesn’t troubleshoot itself

Power BI assumes a human at the keyboard. Digital signage assumes nobody is watching the screen all the time.

That’s a fundamentally different design constraint.

Where Fugo fits (and where it deliberately doesn’t)

Fugo is not:

  • An alternative to Embedded

  • A replacement for Premium

  • A BI tool

  • A way around Power BI licensing

Fugo is a display and orchestration layer. It exists to answer a question Power BI doesn’t try to: How do we keep dashboards reliably visible in shared physical spaces?

Concretely, Fugo:

  • Authenticates once and manages session lifecycles

  • Handles token refresh automatically

  • Supports low-powered or locked-down devices

  • Keeps dashboards running unattended

  • Allows scheduling, rotation, and layout control

  • Uses Power BI APIs without bypassing security

It does for screens what Power BI Embedded does for applications without turning your team into a software vendor.


The pattern that actually works in practice

In mature setups, these tools will stack instead of compete.

A common progression looks like this:

  • Power BI Service for analysis and modeling

  • PowerPoint for meetings and storytelling

  • Digital signage (Fugo) for ambient visibility

  • Embedded only when analytics must become productized

The problems start when teams try to use:

  • Embedded to avoid licenses

  • Premium to power TVs

  • PowerPoint to run unattended

  • Publish to Web for private data


A simple decision lens for when to which use which tool

Instead of asking “Which is cheaper?”, ask:

Question

Tool that answers it

Who is allowed to see this data?

Power BI

How many internal viewers do we have?

Premium

Is this part of a product?

Embedded

Is this for meetings?

PowerPoint

Does this need to live on screens all day?

Digital signage

When each tool stays in its lane, the system stops fighting you.

Did this answer your question?